FAMGA
(Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon) dominate vast swathes of the
technology universe. They literally touch
the lives of billions of people around the globe all day long. They are ferociously innovative and house
some of the brightest minds on the planet across domains. They are literally sitting on hundreds of
billions of dollars of cash and generating truckloads more every passing
day. They have oodles of risk taking ability
and yet…
… and yet they
all seem to collectively shy away from the biggest and grandest prize of all –
the big M – Money. From early history money has risen to replace barter and occupy
a central position in nearly every transaction.
It is usually one half of every single trade/ investment/ commerce transaction
entered between humans, machines and organizations. It is the unit in which humanity measures its
efforts, rewards, wealth and debt. Institutions
have arisen over hundreds of years which help citizens deal with money and
trade. Given the nature of money these
institutions deal in trust and have been blessed by governments of the day via
licenses, regulation, protection etc.
Money,
given its very nature, has easily got digitized; technology permeates
everything in finance – be it payments, lending, borrowing, savings,
investments, ownerships, records – technology is king. Many banks and institutions insist on being
called “technology” companies as investors look favorably on those companies and
as a reflection of the nature of money business. Banks’ technology budgets now constitute a lion’s
share of their spends - both opex and capex.
Still the technology capabilities of banks are distinctly limited
compared to those of FAMGA like technology companies. Their consumer facing applications, their
UI/UX designs, websites, their AI and machine learning capabilities etc come
across as clunky, dated, ponderous and slow creatures from a couple of
generations earlier. Consumers switching
apps from say a Facebook/Amazon to a bank website prepare themselves for a slog
back through time…
Internet
and ecommerce has upended several industries in the past 3 decades e.g. books,
music, hotels, travel, transportation to name just a few. As a digital “native” and as one-half of all
e-commerce transactions, one expected technology companies to play a much
bigger role in the finance space either in payments or funneling funds from
savers to borrowers or enabling business processes in between. However, that has not come to pass. Most technology companies end up providing
some nature of products to banks eg. Operating systems, databases, messaging
infrastructure, office productivity suites etc. Technology
companies seem
to be keeping a distance from the core finance/ banking world. All disruptive innovation is being carried by
anonymous folks a la Satoshi or by small, (relatively) little funded startups. Almost as if there is something holding them
back; almost afraid of something…
Banking/ finance
business needs Capital, Capability, Credibility and Loyalty of customers. Big technology companies have these in ample
measures. Arguably, the technology
titans have more capital (sitting as liquid assets all over the world);
technical, commercial and legal capabilities; credibility in the form of brand
value and trust; and customer loyalty than many banks discredited over years of
questionable management action and behavior.
Surprisingly, Chinese technology majors seem to be straddling their industries and finance more easily than their western counterparts. Will one of
the western technology titans make a move towards this sector or will they watch the
fintech revolution swirling all around us from the side-lines? It would be interesting to understand the dilemma/complexities
facing technology executives as they debate a foray into the financial
world.
You framed the question wonderfully. I suspect the regulatory overhang of getting deep into the banking process is keeping the tech titans on the sidelines.
ReplyDeleteyes, "regulation" seems to the answer doing the rounds.
DeleteFrankly I am baffled that these giants have regard/respect for regulations of this nature. I thought the bigger the prize and the more entrenched the incumbents, the bigger the size of X marked on their foreheads...